|
Storms
of
Chaotic
Fluctuations
in the
Economy
Affect
the
United
States
(By
Beverly
Foust,
Leslie
Stone,
Glenda
Washam,
UoPhx
2008)
A
possible
recession
in the
United
States
(U.S.)
has been
in the
news for
the last
two
months.
However,
a
recession
in the
U.S. is
nothing
new.
Since
the
beginning
of the
21st
century,
the U.S.
has
experienced
extreme
changes
in the
economy.
These
changes
are
sometimes
called
fluctuations
or
business
cycles
in the
economy.
These
economic
instabilities
have
caused
companies
to look
to the
future
with
uncertainty
and to
rethink
how they
do
business.
“In the
most
basic
terms,
business
cycles
refer to
fluctuations
in the
economic
growth
of a
nation's
economy.
Sometimes,
business
cycles
are
simply
referred
to as
ups and
downs in
the
economy”
(Thomson
Gale,
2006, p.
1).
A number
of key
factors
can lead
to
fluctuations
in the
economy.
These
factors
include
“volatility
of
investment
spending;
variations
in
inventories;
fluctuations
in
government
spending;
politically
generated
business
cycles;
fluctuations
in
exports
and
imports;
and
variations
in the
money
supply”
(Thomson
Gale,
2006, p.
6).
Thomson
Gale
(2006)
points
out
fluctuations
in the
economy
have
been
effective
in
“moderating
business
cycles”
(p. 7)
so they
must not
be
eliminated.
Business
cycles
can
influence
some
fluctuations
in the
way
institutions
among
the
realm of
business
remain
buoyant
in their
industry.
This
paper
will
show how
fluctuations
in the
U.S.
economy
can
affect
the
government,
businesses,
and
higher
education
in
connection
to the
components
of the
elements
of
buoyancy
in
Westbrook
Stevens’
Storms
of Chaos
Model.
U.S.
Economy
How
the U.S.
Economy
Works
Conte
and Karr
(2001)
say the
U.S. is
a mixed
economy
with
both
privately
owned
businesses
and the
government
playing
important
roles.
“In this
mixed
economy,
individuals
can help
guide
the
economy
not only
through
the
choices
they
make as
consumers
but
through
the
votes
they
cast for
officials
who
shape
economic
policy”
(Conte &
Karr,
2001,
Chap. 2,
p. 1).
The
graph
below
shows
when
comparing
“the
total
time
spent in
recession,
globally,
the U.S.
is about
average”
(Numbers,
2008, p.
011).

Percentage
of
Months
Spent in
Recession
1962-2007
(Data:
Economic
Cycle
Research
Institute)
Buoyancy
in the
Storms
of Chaos
Model
What
Buoyancy
Represents
in the
Storms
of Chaos
Model
The word
buoyancy
means
either
“the
tendency
or
capacity
to
remain
afloat
in a
liquid
or rise
in air
or gas”
or “the
ability
to
recover
quickly
from
setbacks
such as
in
resilience”
(Answers,
2008).
Westbrook
Stevens
(2001b)
states,
“. . .
ships
often
describe
people
and
organizations.
The
metaphor
is
useful
to
describe
how hard
it is to
turn
those
ships or
for
organizations
to
change”
(p. 2).
In the
Storms
of Chaos
Model
from the
Westbrook
Stevens
website,
the
element
of
buoyancy
represents
the
supporting
strength
that
helps a
company
stay
buoyant
whenever
it runs
into any
unsettling
territories,
such as
fluctuations
in the
economy.
The
chart
below
depicts
the
Storms
of Chaos
Model
and
shows
how the
element
of
buoyancy
helps
keep the
ship,
which
represents
the
company,
afloat.

Buoyancy
in the
Storms
of Chaos
(Westbrook
Stevens,
2001b)
Many
supporting
components
reinforce
the
groundwork
of a
company
and help
the
company
recover
from
various
barriers
and
obstacles.
In the
Storms
of Chaos
Model,
these
components
include
political,
personal,
and
societal
elements,
along
with
supporting
markets
(Westbrook
Stevens,
2001a,
p. 1).
“So we
have a
choice,
we can
master
the
storms
of chaos
or be
mastered
by it”
(Westbrook
Stevens,
2001b,
p. 5).
The
United
States
Government
Political
Alliances
Having
political
alliances
play an
instrumental
part in
the
effects
of the
economy.
The
United
States
(U.S.)
government
became
more
involved
in the
economy
during
the 1929
stock
market
crashed.
This
collapse
caused
the
Great
Depression
and
began
Franklin
D.
Roosevelt’s
New Deal
era. The
U.S.
enacted
many
economic
laws
during
this
time.
Government
activities
have a
powerful
effect
on the
U.S.
economy
in at
least
four
areas:
“Stabilization
and
Growth;
Regulation
and
Control;
Direct
Services;
and
Direct
Assistance”
(Outline,
n.d., p.
1). “In
a
chaotically
changing
environment,
one
never
knows
what is
going to
happen
next”
(Westbrook
Stevens,
2001b,
p. 3).
This
statement
is
especially
true in
the ever
changing
U.S.
economy.
Anything
in the
economy’s
favor,
such as
maintaining
positive
political
alliances,
will
help the
economy
stay
afloat.
Recently,
White
House
representatives
have
said the
U.S.
economy
is on a
“solid
foundation”
and is
only
“going
through
a period
of
economic
uncertainty”
(Spetalnick,
2008,
para.
1).
According
to the
Hoover
Institution
(2008),
“During
a
recession,
consumer
confidence
often
erodes
as
several
negative
economic
conditions
occur
simultaneously”
(para.
8). What
this
assertion
means is
that
during a
time of
economic
aversion,
people
tend to
lose
their
confidence
in not
only the
economy
itself,
but also
with the
government.
On
February
1, 2008,
President
George
W. Bush
stated,
“Today's
jobs
report
is a
troubling
sign
that the
U.S.
economy
is
weaker
and
decisive
action
must be
taken to
help
people
stay in
their
homes” (Rosenkrantz
&
Runningen,
2008,
para.
1).
President
Bush
says the
government
plans to
help the
economy
and he
has
urged
the
Senate
to pass
an
economic
stimulus
plan. On
February
7, 2008,
Congress
passed
the
emergency
plan
that
will
give
rebates
of “$600
to
$1,200
to most
taxpayers
and $300
checks
to
disabled
veterans,
the
elderly,
and
other
low-income
people”
(Taylor
& Davis,
2008,
para.
1).
President
Bush
wanted
the plan
passed
quickly
because
“the
sooner
we can
get
money
into our
consumers'
hands,
the more
likely
the
economy
will
recover
from
this
uncertainty”
(Rosenkrantz
&
Runningen,
2008,
para.
8). The
President
believes
the
economy
is only
going
through
a rough
time and
will
pull
through
with
this new
plan. He
also
hopes
the plan
will
help
foster
the
people’s
confidence
in the
country
again.
However,
this
plan
will
only
prove to
be
successful
if the
money
goes
back
into the
economy
instead
of
people
saving
it.
Lonski
(2008)
points
out,
“Provided
that a
contraction
of
employment
is
avoided,
consumer
spending
ought to
grow by
enough
to keep
the U.S.
out of
recession.
However,
if
employment
shrinks
as home
prices
fall,
the
retrenchment
of
consumer
spending
could be
severe”
(p. 38).
Economist
Brad
DeLong
(2006)
says,
“If
business
cycles
are
simply
fluctuations
around
the
economy’s
long-run
growth
trend
with
production
being
sometimes
above
and
sometimes
below
its
sustainable
level,
then it
is hard
to get
too
worried
about
them” (para.
1). What
DeLong
means by
this
affirmation
is that
whatever
is lost
in a
recession,
the
economy
can gain
back in
the next
boom. In
looking
at
previous
economical
experiences
in the
U.S.
economy,
fluctuations
in the
economy
seem to
be
nothing
more but
a normal
economic
trend.
Business
Personal
Relationships
In
private
business,
companies
often
spend
countless
dollars
to
determine
what the
best
course
of
action
is when
it comes
to their
people.
In fact,
businesses
tend to
lean to
other
businesses
in order
to gain
information
about
what
makes
them a
super
power in
their
industry.
Southwest
Airlines
allows
other
business
executives
to come
under
its wing
to learn
about
the
company’s
people
factor.
This
action
is what
makes
Southwest
Airlines
a prime
example
of an
industry
leader.
A recent
article
written
by Terry
Maxon of
the
Dallas
Morning
News
refers
to
Southwest
Airline’s
corporate
buoyancy.
These
references
came in
part
from a
new book
written
by
former
Chief
Executive
Officer
James
Parker.
In the
article
Maxon
(2008)
says,
For many
years,
companies
have
flocked
to
Southwest
Airlines
Co. to
learn
the
secrets
of its
success,
ex-chief
executive
officer
James
Parker
says.
Yet they
never
seem to
absorb
Southwest's
lessons.
More
accurately,
they
never
accept
the
basic
point:
Take
care of
your
employees,
and
everything
else
falls
into
place.
So they
see
employees
as
expenses
to be
cut,
rather
than
assets
to be
cherished.
(para.
1-3)
“Americans
had a
strong
need for
spiritual
support
and a
positive
outlook
in
coping
with the
aftermath
of the
9/11
terrorist
attacks
. . .”
(Schwarz,
2004,
para.
1).
After
the 9/11
attack
on the
U.S.,
Southwest
held
together
a staff
of
significance
when
most
airlines
were
letting
employees
go.
Southwest
finds
its
corporate
buoyancy
directly
attributed
to the
people,
not only
the
people
who
receive
their
paychecks
from
Southwest,
but also
the
customers.
People
are the
key to
the
success
of this
industry.
Southwest
believes
in doing
the
right
thing.
This
principle
has
proven
to be a
viable
marketing
technique.
Southwest
has used
this
technique
to take
hold of
corporate
buoyancy
when it
comes to
societal,
as well.
Consumers
like to
do
business
with
Southwest
and
therefore,
continue
to do
so.
Consumers
recognize
that
Southwest
is
making
every
effort
to make
its
flying
experience
as
cost-effective
and
enjoyable
as
possible.
Other
airlines
have not
followed
suit.
As the
economy
begins
the
shifts
that are
currently
being
forecast,
companies
like
Southwest
will
again
rise to
the
occasion,
floating
along as
if there
were
little
storm to
be
considered.
Its
buoyancy
is
credited
to its
business
practices
and the
people
who
carry
those
out each
day.
Other
companies
will
stand by
and take
note,
hoping
for the
same
fate
even
with the
historical
odds not
in their
favor.
Societal
Elements
For
businesses
to
remain
at the
top of
their
respective
industry,
they
cannot
ignore
their
social
responsibility
to
society.
In
December
of 2006,
Michael
E.
Porter
and Mark
R.
Kramer
wrote a
piece
for the
Harvard
Business
Review
titled,
Strategy
&
Society,
The Link
Between
Competitive
Advantage
and
Corporate
Social
Responsibility.
In this
article,
the
authors
tell the
readers
of the
importance
of
Corporate
Social
Responsibility
(CSR) as
it
relates
to
successful
business
practices.
This
article
is
supportive
of the
Buoyancy
Theory
from
Westbrook
Stevens.
“When
looked
at
strategically,
corporate
social
responsibility
can
become a
source
of
tremendous
social
progress,
as the
business
applies
its
considerable
resources,
expertise,
and
insights
to
activities
that
benefit
society”
(Porter
&
Kramer,
2006, p.
1).
Porter
and
Kramer
(2006)
dive
deeply
into the
realm of
what
truly
understanding
CSR can
mean for
a
company’s
survival
in
today’s
aggressive
business
markets.
While
most
companies
have
voluntarily
submitted
to the
rise of
CSR, not
all went
willingly.
Some
arrived
at their
decisions
based
upon
“being
surprised
by
public
responses
to
issues
they had
not
previously
thought
were
part of
their
business
responsibilities”
(Porter
&
Kramer,
2006, p.
2).
Porter
and
Kramer
(2006)
used
examples
like the
Nike
boycott
due to
unfair
labor
practices
and
Greenpeace
protests
when
Shell
Oil sank
an oil
rig.
Suddenly
these
companies
faced
CSR head
on.
These
companies
had to
exhibit
a
certain
amount
of
corporate
buoyancy
to
survive.
They had
to
choose
to
behave
in a
manner
that
gained
them
favor in
their
respective
industries.
The
public
was
watching,
prepared
to hold
them
fiscally
accountable
for
their
mistakes.
Higher
Education
Supporting
Markets
Economic
fluctuations
mostly
affect
business,
but
higher
education
is not
immune
to tough
times.
Compared
to
private
business,
higher
education
does
have it
easier.
Universities
run by
the
government
have a
built-in
safety
net. The
government
will
always
be there
to fund
higher
education.
The
schools
may face
budget
cutbacks,
but few
shut
down due
to a
failing
economy.
This
portion
of the
paper
will
focus on
how
supporting
markets
and
economic
fluctuations
affect
private
universities.
The
supporting
markets
of these
private
higher
education
organizations
are the
students,
faculty,
donors,
suppliers,
alumni,
and
parents.
These
individuals
keep the
colleges
and
universities
afloat.
A
college
does not
exist
without
the
students
and
teachers.
The
donors
and
alumni
are
essential
also
since
they
provide
financial
support.
Another
tool
that
private
institutions
have is
an
endowment.
Purdue
University’s
website
states,
“An
endowment
is a
gift
that is
held in
perpetuity
and
invested
in a
manner
that
protects
the
principal
from
inflation.
Investment
income
provides
a stable
funding
source
for such
purposes
as
scholarships,
professorships,
lecture
series,
and
research
centers”
(2008).
As
donors
make
gifts to
the
endowment,
the
university
pools
these
gifts
into one
endowment
fund. By
combining
the
gifts,
this
“allows
Purdue
to
achieve
greater
diversity
in its
investments,
lower
its
investment
costs,
and
attain
the
maximum
return
on
donors’
gifts”
(Purdue
University,
2008).
Concordia
University
of
Wisconsin’s
website
states
that
earnings
from its
endowment
go
toward
funds
specified
by the
donor.
“The
rest of
the
earnings
are
reallocated
back
into the
fund’s
principle
to
insure
that the
endowment
continues
to grow
and
yield
more
interest
for
future
scholarships
and
support”
(2008).
The
university
defines
an
endowment
as “an
amount
of money
(fund)
that is
given to
the
University
with a
stipulation
that the
funds
are
invested
to earn
annual
interest
rather
than
spent
immediately”
(2008).
Endowed
gifts
allow
the
donor to
establish
a legacy
since
the
endowed
funds
are
there
after he
or she
is gone.
Purdue’s
website
says,
“Because
endowments
are held
in
perpetuity
and
invested
for the
long
term,
these
gifts
provide
one of
the most
secure
sources
of
future
revenue”
(2008).
Given
their
perpetuity,
endowed
gifts
are part
of the
buoyancy
of
private
universities.
Having
endowed
funds
assures
the
university
can
carry
out
business
in any
economy.
Essentially
universities
are
major
businesses
with
many
operating
units.
University
of
Oregon
President,
Dr.
Edward
Ray
said,
“In many
respects,
a large
public
research
university
like
Oregon
State
University
is a
major
business”
(Oregon
State
University,
2003).
In 2003,
Dr. Ray
was
responsible
for a
$580
million
budget
that
covered
buildings,
a
library,
dining
facilities,
a
football
field,
and many
other
areas of
the
university.
A
university
is a
major
multi-faceted
business.
Most
businesses
would
not
attempt
to
undertake
a
business
with
that
many
areas.
Universities
need
project
management
in order
to
manage
all the
areas.
The
university’s
leadership
has a
fiduciary
responsibility
to
manage
the
money
wisely.
If the
university
leaders
are good
stewards
of
donor’s
money,
they can
bring in
more
gifts.
If the
university
squanders
donor’s
money,
donors
are not
inclined
to give
again.
The
University
of
Wisconsin
spent
$26
million
to
install
the new
payroll
software
Larson,
but the
project
fell
apart,
and the
project
was
aborted.
Edward
Meachen
said,
“We
would
have
probably
been
operating
Lawson
right
now if
we had
excellent
project
management”
(Carnevale,
2006, p.
1). The
lack of
good
project
management
hurt the
payroll
installation
project
as well
as the
rest of
the
university.
Another
area of
an
university
that
uses
project
management
is the
medical
center.
The
book,
The
Project
Surgeon:
A
Troubleshooter’s
Guide to
Business
Crisis
Management
addresses
the role
of
project
management
for the
medical
center (Hornjak,
2001).
“According
to
Hornjak,
a good
project
surgeon
will
apply
three
therapies:
emergency
management,
crisis
management,
and
crisis
prevention”
(Rose,
2001).
Hornjak
says
that
surgeons
face
these
situations
in their
jobs.
Sometimes
they
face
these
situations
in one
surgery.
These
examples
illustrate
how
universities
can
benefit
from
project
management
in the
different
areas.
Private
universities
are
fortunate
to have
endowed
money to
help
them
operate.
They
have a
responsibility
to spend
their
endowed
fund
wisely
and not
waste
money.
Like any
organization,
universities
have to
cut
costs
when the
economy
dips.
The
endowed
funds
keep the
university
running
while
organizations
without
this
money
source
would
make
major
cuts.
Conclusion
Staying
afloat
in an
economic
downturn
is
treacherous,
but this
paper
has
shown
how the
Storms
of Chaos
can
help. It
would be
in the
best
interest
of any
company
to
evaluate
its
buoyancy
and
determine
how to
manage
it.
Companies
that
take
advantage
of this
opportunity
will
survive
any
economic
crisis.
Companies
not
taking
advantage
of their
buoyancy
are
victims
of the
lightning,
waves,
and
overall
storm.
The U.S.
government
is a
business
in
itself
and
manages
its
political
alliances
to keep
the
country
running.
Businesses
such as
Southwest
Airlines
realize
their
employees
are part
of their
buoyancy
and keep
the
company
running
while
their
competitors
are
struggling.
Lastly,
private
universities
use
their
supporting
markets
to stay
afloat.
Their
supporting
markets
are the
students,
faculty,
donors,
suppliers,
alumni,
and
donors.
This
group
and
their
endowments
help the
universities
operate
smoothly
when the
rest of
the
country
is
fighting
economic
uncertainty.
These
examples
show
that the
skill
sets
provided
by the
Storms
of Chaos
will
help
businesses
and
organizations
survive
in
troubled
times.
As
explained
earlier
in the
paper,
ships
cannot
make
quick
turns,
but with
notice
and
planning,
ships
can turn
around.
If
businesses
and
organizations
apply
these
principles,
they can
anticipate
the
storms
and make
corrections
so they
survive
and
maybe
thrive
in
troubling
times.
References
-
Carnevale,
D.
(2006,
July
21).
The
chronicle
of
higher
education.
U.
of
Wisconsin
gives
up
on
$26-million
effort
to
install
payroll
software.
Retrieved
February
10,
2008,
from
Nexis
Lexis
database
-
Concordia
University
of
Wisconsin.
(2008).
Giving
to
CUW.
Retrieved
February
3,
2008,
from
http://www.cuw.edu/Giving_CUW/what_endowment.html
-
Conte,
C.,
&
Karr,
A.
(2001).
Outline
of
the
U.S.
economy.
How
the
U.S.
economy
works.
Retrieved
February
3,
2008,
from
http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap2.htm
-
DeLong,
B.
(2006).
Are
business
cycles
fluctuations
around
trend
or
not?
Retrieved
January
31,
2008,
from
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2006/01/are_business_cy.html
-
Hoover
Institution.
(2008).
Recession
and
the
U.S.
economy.
Retrieved
January
31,
2008,
from
http://www.hoover.org/research/focusonissues/focus/14776626.html
-
Hornjak,
B.
(2001,
April).
The
project
surgeon:
A
troubleshooter's
guide
to
business
crisis
management.
Newton
Square,
Pennsylvania:
Project
Management
Institute.
-
Lonski,
J.
(2008,
December/January).
Will
the
Fed
cut
enough?
Treasury
&
Risk,
38.
-
Maxon,
T.
(2008).
Ex-Southwest
Airlines
CEO
James
Parker
shares
lessons
in
book.
Retrieved
February
5,
2008,
from
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/
DNsouthwest_21bus.State.Edition1.2bd764c.html
-
Numbers.
(2008,
January
21).
BusinessWeek,
011.
-
Oregon
State
University.
(2003,
October
15).
The
business
of
running
a
large
public
research
university.
Retrieved
February
10,
2008,
from
http://oregonstate.edu/leadership/president/runningUniversity10_15_03.html
-
Porter,
M. &
Kramer,
M.
(2006).
Strategy
&
Society,
The
Link
Between
Competitive
Advantage
and
Corporate
Social
Responsibility.
Harvard
Business
Review.
Retrieved
February
12,
2008,
from
http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/email/pdfs/
Porter_Dec_2006.pdf
-
Purdue
University.
(2008).
The
Purdue
University
endowment.
Retrieved
February
3,
2008,
from
http://www.purdue.edu/udo/pages/giving/endowments.html#what
-
Rose,
K.
(2001,
September).
Review:
The
project
surgeon:
A
troubleshooter’s
guide
to
business
crisis
management.
Project
Management
Journal.
Retrieved
February
11,
2008,
from
Nexis-Lexis
database
-
Rosenkrantz,
H.,
&
Runningen,
R.
(2008).
Bush
says
`Serious
signs'
U.S.
economy
is
weakening
(Update2).
Retrieved
February
3,
2008,
from
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/newspid=20601103&sid=
ax4qT3UnRDBU&refer=us
-
Schwarz,
J.
(2004).
Americans
had
strong
need
for
spiritual
support
following
9/11
attacks.
Retrieved
January
29,
2008,
from
http://uwnews.washington.edu/ni/article.asp?articleID=5611
-
Spetalnick,
M.
(2008).
White
House:
Economy
solid
but
uncertainty
exists.
Retrieved
February
3,
2008,
from
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080201/us_nm/economy_bush_dc&printer=1;_
ylt=Aoaae6DKONbsR5UjsWaepjoN5LIF
-
Taylor,
A.,
&
Davis.
J.
(2008).
Stimulus
bill’s
OK
to
speed
rebates.
Retrieved
February
8,
2008,
from
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/feb/08/stimulus-billsok-to-speed-rebates/
-
Thomson
Gale
(part
of
Thomson
Corporation).
(2006).
Business
cycles.
Retrieved
January
31,
2008,
from
http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/BreCap/Business-Cycles.html
-
Westbrook
Stevens.
(2001a).
The
buoyancy.
Retrieved
January
29,
2008,
from
http://www.westbrookstevens.com/Buoyancy.htm
-
Westbrook
Stevens
(2001b).
The
linked
management
models.
Retrieved
February
10,
2008,
from
http://www.westbrookstevens.com/Step%202.htm
|
|
Buoyancy in The
Storms of Chaos Model
By Tricia Sholar (UoPhx 2007)
edited by Craig Stevens
Buoyancy in The Storms of Chaos Model represents
those forces that help to support the organizational ship. Merriam
–Webster defines buoyancy “as (1) the tendency of a body to float or to
rise when submerged in a fluid; the power of a fluid to exert an upward
force on a body placed in it; the upward force exerted, (2) the ability
to recover quickly from depression or discouragement, and (3) the
property of maintaining a satisfactorily high level - as of prices or
economic activity” (Merriam-Webster, 2007).
Buoyancy includes external elements that help support the ship and may
include customers, society and its norms, the political and legal
system, the economy, geographical location, and other environmental
occurrences. Each element can also be described as stakeholders in the
organization. Stakeholders can be defined as any one or thing that
participates in any aspect of the organization whether intentionally or
not. The stakeholders are concerned about or effect by the
organization’s well being because of its relationship to the
stakeholders’ well being (Charron, 2007).
Customers
One measure of success for an organization is market share. The
primary focus of the organization should be its customers and customer
make up the market. The goal of relationship marketing is to create a
long-term value for the customer while measuring the success by
long-term customer satisfaction (Knox & Gruar, 2007).
Political and Legal System
Organizations also have to understand political and legal systems.
The laws that govern business are directly related to politics.
Political leaders are the key to the easement, restriction, and/or
control of the businesses. Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means wrote “The
Modern Corporation and Private Property” which has become a popular as
well as influential resource related to focus on governance. In this
book, Berle and Means believed that the corporation’s control will
diminish to the society’s political control (Charron, 2007).
Society
The goal of society is to attain ideal values (Freeman et al, 2007).
The political system that is in place was put in control by both past
and current society for the good of future societies. Due to society
choosing the politics in place, an organization’s leaders should be
keenly aware of the societal and potential norms. The stakeholder theory
began as an idea that the organization is not in sole existence simply
to make a profit for the stockholders but rather is a social
association. Furthermore, this theory portrays that the organizations
are indebted for its security not to the stockholders but to society.
Due to this security, the organization should carry out the social
belief of the public (Charron, 2007). One demand made by society on the
organization is to report to both internal and external stakeholders on
the organization’s social and moral activity. While society demands that
organization engage in morally responsible actions, captivating the
stakeholders is usually seen as a morally neutral action (Greenwood,
2007). Society mandates that the organizational leaders are to maintain
and keep morality in all decision-making so to avoid fraud in the
marketplace. With this knowledge, society mandates that this constraint
on the behaviors of everyone including those outside the organization is
universally experienced (Charron, 2007).
The Economy
In order to create value in the global market environment,
organizations are continually looking for the long-term competitive
advantage (Lopez, 2007). Depending on the integration of core concepts
such as management quality, environmental management, brand reputation,
customer loyalty, corporate ethics, and talent retention, an
organization may or may not be deemed successful (Lopez, 2007). A push
by society in recent years has been for organizations to implement
policies that will maintain sustainable development (Lopez, 2007). The
macroeconomic stake also affects the financial behaviors that an
organization discloses (Holder-Webb & Cohen, 2007). Depending on whether
an organization has good investment prospects or not, an organization
may choose to file bankruptcy with the economy as the primary reason
(Holder-Webb & Cohen, 2007). An organization will use different aspects
of income smoothing disclosure practices based on whether there is bull
or bear market (Holder-Webb & Cohen, 2007). Researchers now understand
that the market economy is a powerful means of organizing society and
creating value (Freeman et al, 2007). The investor is viewed as the
primary growth developer for the economy therefore, any obstacles to the
investor are also viewed as obstacles to wealth creation (Freeman et al,
2007). An entrepreneur usually is the propeller to the demise of a
current market in order to introduce the new market that buoys the
upcoming trends (Freeman et al, 2007). Competition is necessary to
future economic stability. It aids in value creation, prevents an
oversaturated market as well as the depletion of resources, and resolves
competitor demands and threats (Freeman et al, 2007).
Geographical Location
The language, culture, and location of an organization are key
factors to the long-term sustainability of an organization (Cumming &
Johan, 2007). An individual’s cultural membership is the basis for the
identity and capabilities that an individual portrays (Westerman et al,
2007). The choices an individual makes are based on the cultural
membership established. These choices usually affect the economics of
the area in which all aspects of the individual’s life are contained (Westerman
et al, 2007). Based on this information, the leaders of an organization
should be aware of the demographics of the neighborhood so to attract
the potential customers.
The Environment
One example of environmental effects on an organization is a
historical meteorological and oceanographic event called El Nino
Southern Oscillation, or El Nino (Laosuthi & Selover, 2007). El Nino is
believed to be responsible for the 10 to 20 percent change in the gross
domestic product growth as well as the global consumer price inflation (Laosuthi,
& Selover, 2007). The effects of El Nino on the United States are
generally indicated by increased rainfall in the South along with
flooding on the West Coast, warmer climates in the Northeast, a decrease
in tornadic occurrences in the Midwest, and decreased hurricane
development on the East coast (Laosuthi & Selover, 2007). Lasting 12 to
18 months and described as the warm phase, El Nino has a counteractive
second phase that lasts the same amount of time and is usually believed
to be the cold phase called La Nina (Laosuthi & Selover, 2007). The
potential impact on the economy by these changes in weather patterns is
substantial to the agricultural, fishing, and construction industries (Laosuthi
& Selover, 2007). A second example of an environmental event that had a
devastating impact on the economy and a geographical location happened
in August 2005. When Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of the United
States, the region was crippled by the devastation. The heartbeat of
Louisiana, New Orleans, was flooded for multiple weeks ending years of
business development and impacted the law of supply and demand. The
petro-chemical industry in particular was disabled due to a large
refinery in Gulfport, Mississippi having been destroyed. The industry’s
offshore oil rigs as well as some corporate offices sustained
substantial damage leaving parts of the organizations as inoperable for
many months.
Conclusion
Ideal values are attained by society based on aspects of consumer
activity. Organizational success is measured by the industry as well as
marketability. These areas as well as the internal infrastructure must
be maintained. Attracting and retaining customers should remain the
organization’s primary focus, however the organization must also look to
the factors that allow the customers to spend. If any of the additional
factors of buoyancy are out of balance, the entire organizational
buoyancy is affected. The primary political parties in the United States
have polar opposite agendas yet economic functionality is impacted by
the party in power. Based on the agenda of the party, the types of laws
passed can be either beneficial or devastating to the organization.
Financial conservation is determined by the customer based on the
strength of the market.
References
-
Charron, Donna Card.
Stockholders and Stakeholders: The Battle for Control of the
Corporation. Cato Journal , Vol. 27, No. 1. Winter 2007. Retrieved
from EBSCO Host on October 12, 2007.
-
Cumming, Douglas and Sofia
Johan. Socially Responsible Institutional Investment in Private
Equity. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 75 pp 395-416. 2007.
Retrieved from EBSCO Host on October 12, 2007.
-
Freeman, R. Edward, Kirsten
Martin, and Parmar Bidhan. Stakeholder Capitalism. Journal of
Business Ethics, Vol. 74 pp 303-314. 2007. Retrieved from EBSCO Host
on October 12, 2007.
-
Greenwood, Michelle.
Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility.
Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 74 pp 315-327. 2007.
-
Retrieved from EBSCO Host on
October 12, 2007.
Holder-Webb, Lori, and Jaffrey R. Cohen. The Association between
Disclosure, Distress, and Failure. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.
75 pp 301-314. 2007. Retrieved from EBSCO Host on October 12, 2007.
-
Knox, Simon, and Colin Gruar.
The Application of Stakeholder Theory to Relationship Marketing
Strategy Development in a Non-profit Organization. Journal of
Business Ethics, Vol. 75 pp 115-135. 2007. Retrieved from EBSCO Host
on October 12, 2007.
-
Laosuthi, Thanarak, and David
D. Selover. Does El Nino Affect Business Cycles?. Eastern Economic
Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1. Winter 2007. Retrieved from EBSCO Host on
October 12, 2007.
-
Lopez, M. Victoria, Arminda
Garcia, and Lazaro Rodriguez. Sustainable Development and Corporate
Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.
Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 75 pp 285-300. 2007. Retrieved from
EBSCO Host on October 12, 2007.
-
Merriam-Webster Online
Dictionary. Retrieved from http:
www.merriamwebster.com
on October 12, 2007.
-
Westerman, James W., Rafik I.
Beekun, Yvonne Stedham, and Jeanne Yamamura. Peers Versus National
Culture: An Analysis of Antecedents to Ethical Decision-making.
Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 75 pp 239-252. 2007. Retrieved from
EBSCO Host on October 12, 2007.
|